Autonomous coding for Claude Code · v0.14.1
When I'm asleep or buried in the day job, I want the pipeline to keep moving but not blindly — so autorun runs the same gates I'd step through manually, takes up to three swings at fixing what fails, and leaves a PR or a failure report waiting in the morning.
An 8-command pipeline for Claude Code: /spec → /spec-review → /blueprint → /check → /build, plus /autorun when you want to queue features and walk away. Specialist reviewer agents — personas, each tuned to one concern like security or scope — run in parallel at every gate (the pause points between phases where work gets reviewed). Their findings get judged and synthesized before the next phase starts.
Built for solo developers and small teams using Claude Code on personal or production projects. MIT-licensed, local install, no hosted service.
$ git clone https://github.com/Jstottlemyer/MonsterFlow.git ~/Projects/MonsterFlow
$ cd ~/Projects/MonsterFlow && ./install.sh
Drop one or more feature briefs into queue/, set a cron, walk away. Each feature runs through the same five gates you'd step through manually — /spec-review, /blueprint, /check, /build, then a PR — except autorun is a little more permissive than I'd be over my own shoulder. It lets clean runs ship and quarantines messy ones for morning triage instead of paging me at 3am.
What lands when you open your laptop. The Judge step at every gate dedupes findings across the parallel reviewers, resolves contradictions, and writes one synthesized artifact you can read in two minutes. A real morning artifact looks like this:
The plan's design intent is sound and the wave structure is well-shaped, but two file-grounded errors in the resolver pseudocode will fail acceptance criteria on day one. Codex independently verified both against the live repo. Until these are corrected in the plan (not just acknowledged), /build would produce a resolver that emits no personas for one of the three gates and crashes on a nonexistent ranking field.
install.sh --reconfigure round-trip has no test task; 6/14 ACs partial coverage, 2/14 outright gapscore field; gate-to-directory mapping wrong; participation schema v2 violates additionalProperties: false5 of 5 Claude reviewers PASS WITH NOTES; Codex returns hard FAIL with three file-grounded blockers verified against the live repo. Net verdict: NO-GO — Codex's blockers cannot be deferred to /build because they invalidate the plan's central pseudocode.
That morning I read the verdict, fixed the three Codex blockers in the plan, re-queued the spec, and the next overnight run shipped clean. The artifact above is real — it lives at docs/specs/account-type-agent-scaling/check.md. Every overnight run leaves something this concrete behind.
When a gate flags an architectural or security blocker, autorun doesn't give up on the first cycle — and it doesn't loop forever either. It takes up to three logged swings at the same blocker, then halts and hands the run off to me. The cap is configurable per project; the audit trail is JSONL on disk.
Try to solve. Don't burn tokens endlessly.
Same blocker × 3 attempts → halt with a full audit trail. Counter resets on a clean check.
Why three. One swing isn't enough — the first cycle often catches a real fix that the next check would clear. Five is too many — by then the model is usually circling. Three matches the rate at which a real blocker either resolves or stays stuck. Cap is set per axis and configurable: SECURITY_MAX_FIX_ATTEMPTS today, broadening to all blocking axes via the pipeline-iterative-resolution-loops spec. Audit log: docs/specs/<slug>/.security-attempts.log (one JSONL row per attempt, with run id and finding ids).
auto_merge_policy in the spec) and requires the gates I trust for that codebase to be green. The pipeline doesn't yet run a post-build runtime check (playwright / E2E / smoke); until it does, "clean gates" doesn't mean "validated end-to-end" and the default stays conservative.queue/STOP any time and the next iteration boundary halts cleanly. Mid-flight runs finish what they're on; the queue stops.# Drop a brief into queue/ as .spec.md, then:
0 22 * * * cd ~/Projects/MonsterFlow && scripts/autorun/autorun-batch.sh --mode=overnight
Or kick off a single slug right now: scripts/autorun/run.sh <slug>. Either path writes per-stage artifacts under queue/<slug>/ and the durable record under docs/specs/<slug>/.
Want the long version? The full policy framework — every override, every audit trail, every known limitation — lives at docs/specs/autorun-overnight-policy/. Shipped in v0.14: pipeline-pacing-and-prefill (start/end banners at every gate, two-path /compact prompts, input grammar normalize, CLAUDE.md tab-accept doc); install.sh portability + auto-install + tail-summary block; defensive env shield (resolver auto-correct + doctor.sh env-pollution check). In flight: mobile-verify-skill (v0.14.1 candidate — hub-and-spoke build verifier); pipeline-eta-from-timing-data (v0.15 candidate — real-data ETA from stage timing). All tracked in BACKLOG.md.
Why this exists. I've always been a builder, so when none of the harnesses I could find had all the self-learning loops I wanted (a fully self-improving harness that adapts to how the user actually leverages the tool), I built one. My years of coding, architecting, and leading grew and changed my skills, my time became more valuable to guide others, and my fingers crept further from the keyboard in a Faustian deal to provide more value. As I sit looking at my 7 CMUX tabs and my MonsterFlow harness, I feel I can build anything, just not everything; even I have limits and can only get my ideas out so quickly.
MonsterFlow is partly my answer to that distance: when I can't be on every keystroke, I want to at least know which of the reviewers are catching what matters and which are noise dressed up as rigor. The 5 multi-agent gates give the leverage. The judging is what gives me the trust.
Early signals are encouraging: drift on a few personas I'd otherwise have kept around, a wave-sequencer persona suggested by an adversarial Codex review and now earning its slot, graph-driven queries hitting 10–20× fewer tokens than full-corpus reads on the codebases I've benchmarked. Whether any of that holds across more features and more contributors is the next 50 wraps' worth of homework. As one of my friends recently confessed: I don't ship code anymore, I ship outcomes.
Justin · MIT-licensed, genuinely experimental · Read the full note →
Five gates between an idea and shipped code. Specialist agents run in parallel at each one — their findings judged, deduplicated, and synthesized before the next phase starts. After the first /spec you can jump to /autorun if you want less control or to run things overnight. Otherwise step through gate by gate and evaluate the plan as you go.
flowchart TD
K["/kickoff\nconstitution + agent roster"]:::setup
S["/spec\nQ&A · confidence-tracked"]:::define
SR["/spec-review\nrequirements · gaps · ambiguity\nfeasibility · scope · stakeholders"]:::review
JS1["Judge · Dedupe · Synth\ncluster · attribute · compose → review.md"]:::synth
P["/blueprint\napi · data-model · ux · scalability\nsecurity · integration · wave-sequencer"]:::plan
JS2["Judge · Dedupe · Synth → design.md"]:::synth
C["/check\ncompleteness · sequencing · risk\nscope-discipline · testability"]:::gate
JS3["Judge · Dedupe · Synth → check.md\nthree-tier verdict"]:::synth
V1["GO\nclean pass"]:::verdictGo
V2["GO_WITH_FIXES\nwarn → followups.jsonl\n(common case in permissive mode)"]:::verdictWarn
V3["NO_GO\narchitectural · security · unclassified\nhalt"]:::verdictBlock
B["/build\nparallel execute\n(consumes followups wave 1)"]:::execute
W["/wrap"]:::wrap
K --> S --> SR --> JS1 --> P --> JS2 --> C --> JS3
JS3 --> V1 --> B
JS3 --> V2 --> B
JS3 --> V3
B --> W
SP["Superpowers\nTDD · verification"]:::side
CX["Codex\nadversarial review"]:::accent
KL["Knowledge layer\ngraphify · wiki"]:::side
PM["Persona Metrics\nload-bearing · silent · survival rates"]:::metrics
SP -.-> B
CX -.-> SR
CX -.-> C
CX -.-> B
W -. compiles .-> KL
JS1 ==records==> PM
JS2 ==> PM
JS3 ==> PM
W ==surfaces drift==> PM
KL -. "wiki-query · graphify\nauto-memory" .-> S
PM -. "drift informs\nroster decisions" .-> K
%% Codex edges (links 4,5,6 = CX→SR, CX→C, CX→B) are visually softened
%% so they read as ambient adversarial reviews without competing with
%% the main forward flow. Same intent as the other dashed-orange edges,
%% just lower-opacity stroke so overlapping reads as a wash, not a clash.
linkStyle 4,5,6 stroke:#92400e,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray:4 3,opacity:0.55
classDef setup fill:#1e3a5f,stroke:#7c9cff,color:#bfdbfe,stroke-width:2px
classDef define fill:#0f4c4c,stroke:#5eead4,color:#99f6e4,stroke-width:2px
classDef review fill:#7c2d12,stroke:#fdba74,color:#fed7aa,stroke-width:2px
classDef plan fill:#3b1f7a,stroke:#c4b5fd,color:#ede9fe,stroke-width:2px
classDef gate fill:#881337,stroke:#fda4af,color:#ffe4e6,stroke-width:2px
classDef execute fill:#14532d,stroke:#86efac,color:#bbf7d0,stroke-width:2px
classDef wrap fill:#27272a,stroke:#a1a1aa,color:#e4e4e7,stroke-width:2px
classDef synth fill:#0c3a5f,stroke:#7dd3fc,color:#bae6fd,stroke-width:2px
classDef side fill:#1e293b,stroke:#64748b,color:#94a3b8,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:4 3
classDef accent fill:#451a03,stroke:#fde68a,color:#fde68a,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:4 3
classDef metrics fill:#2d1b69,stroke:#a78bfa,color:#e9d5ff,stroke-width:3px
classDef verdictGo fill:#14532d,stroke:#86efac,color:#bbf7d0,stroke-width:2px
classDef verdictWarn fill:#713f12,stroke:#fde047,color:#fef9c3,stroke-width:2px
classDef verdictBlock fill:#7f1d1d,stroke:#fca5a5,color:#fee2e2,stroke-width:2px
Three-tier verdict at /check. Instead of a binary halt-or-pass, every gate emits one of three verdicts: GO (clean pass), GO_WITH_FIXES (non-architectural findings logged as follow-ups and consumed by /build wave 1 — the common case overnight), and NO_GO (architectural, security, or unclassified findings halt the pipeline). The same verdict shape applies at /spec-review and /blueprint; /check is the last gate before code.
Each gate runs specialist agents in parallel; a Judge then clusters their raw output, attributes each finding to its source, and composes the synthesized artifact that drives the next phase. spec.md captures intent through Q&A, then feeds 7 PRD reviewers → Judge → review.md; that feeds 7 design agents → Judge → design.md; that feeds 6 check validators → Judge → check.md. /build executes against the design with TDD and verification discipline. /wrap distills what changed back into memory and the wiki. Small work skips the gates it doesn't need — same flow scales from a typo fix to a V2.
Codex (optional). If installed, an OpenAI Codex agent runs an adversarial pass at /spec-review, /check, and /build — independent perspective from a different model family, joining the same Judge synthesis as the in-house personas. Silent skip if not set up.
Every gate quietly records which findings shaped the next phase. /wrap Phase 1c renders the drift table and emits triage candidates for any persona that shifted meaningfully — closing the loop into Phase 2.
flowchart LR
R["Roster
39 personas + Codex"]:::roster
G["3 multi-agent gates
/spec-review · /blueprint · /check"]:::gate
E["findings.jsonl
participation.jsonl
survival.jsonl"]:::data
W["/wrap Phase 1c
10-feature window
drift → [TRIAGE]"]:::metrics
H["Human reads drift
roster judgment"]:::human
R --> G
G ==records==> E
E ==> W
W ==surfaces==> H
H -. roster edit .-> R
classDef roster fill:#1e293b,stroke:#64748b,color:#94a3b8,stroke-width:2px
classDef gate fill:#881337,stroke:#fda4af,color:#ffe4e6,stroke-width:2px
classDef data fill:#0c3a5f,stroke:#7dd3fc,color:#bae6fd,stroke-width:2px
classDef metrics fill:#2d1b69,stroke:#a78bfa,color:#e9d5ff,stroke-width:3px
classDef human fill:#14532d,stroke:#86efac,color:#bbf7d0,stroke-width:2px
Each Judge writes findings.jsonl (what each persona raised) and participation.jsonl (who ran). When you revise the spec or plan, a survival classifier compares pre- and post-artifacts and labels each finding addressed / not_addressed / rejected. /wrap Phase 1c rolls a 10-feature window into per-persona stats — load-bearing rate, silent rate, survival — renders drift (e.g. ↑ a11y 4% → 18%, ↓ test-quality 22% → 9%), and emits [TRIAGE MEMORY] lines for any persona that shifted ≥ 5pp. Those triage candidates flow into Phase 2's approval gate — roster edits can be written in the same session.
/wrap doesn't just end a session — it compiles what you learned into stores that the next session reads from. Every /spec and /kickoff starts smarter than the last.
flowchart LR
subgraph SN["Session N"]
direction TB
W["/wrap
distill · capture · index"]:::wrap
end
W --> G[("graphify graph
code structure ·
god nodes")]:::store
W --> WIKI[("Obsidian wiki
distilled
knowledge pages")]:::store
W --> MEM[("CLAUDE.md
+ auto-memory
preferences ·
decisions")]:::store
W --> RAW[("_raw/
cheap
captures")]:::store
RAW -. wiki-ingest at next /wrap .-> WIKI
subgraph SN1["Session N+1, N+2, ..."]
direction TB
S["/spec · /kickoff
starts with full prior context"]:::define
end
G -. /graphify query .-> S
WIKI -. wiki-query .-> S
MEM -. auto-loaded at session start .-> S
classDef wrap fill:#3f3f46,stroke:#d4d4d8,color:#fff
classDef define fill:#0f766e,stroke:#5eead4,color:#fff
classDef store fill:#1e293b,stroke:#7c9cff,color:#e7e9ee
Compile, don't retrieve. Capture is cheap during the session ("capture this: X" → _raw/). Distillation happens once at /wrap. Reads at the start of the next session are free — the wiki is already structured, the graph is already built, memory is already loaded.
Measured weekly. Graph-driven queries on real codebases land ~10–20× fewer tokens than full-corpus reads — 14.2× on a 1.5K-node codebase, 16.4× on a 2.2K-node one. scripts/benchmark-json.sh writes data to dashboard/data/<project>.jsonl; see the example dashboard for what it looks like, or open dashboard/index.html from your local clone to see your own data.
The default /wrap runs the full ingestion chain — no flags needed. /wrap-quick skips all three insight phases for speed. /wrap-full forces phases that would otherwise soft-skip.
flowchart TD
ENTRY["/wrap\nwrap-quick · wrap-full"]:::entry
P1["Phase 1 · always\nsummary + token cost"]:::always
P1a["Phase 1a · default\nfacets → friction · outcome\nskip: quick"]:::auto
P1b["Phase 1b · default\ninsights-parser → report.html\nCLAUDE.md · hooks · skills · prompts\nskip: quick"]:::auto
P1c["Phase 1c · default\npersona drift · [TRIAGE] on ≥5pp\nskip: quick or cold-start"]:::auto
P2["Phase 2 · always\nlearning triage\napprove → CLAUDE.md · Memory · Settings · Skills"]:::triage
P2c["Phase 2c · conditional\nwiki flush + distill\nif vault present"]:::wiki
P3["Phases 3–4 · default\ngit loose ends · dep audit\npermission cleanup\nskip: quick (partial)"]:::loose
P5["Phase 5 · default\nCLAUDE.md health check\nskip: quick"]:::health
CM["CLAUDE.md"]:::artifact
MEM["Memory\nfeedback · project · ref"]:::artifact
ENTRY --> P1 --> P1a --> P1b --> P1c --> P2
P2 --> CM & MEM
P2 -. vault .-> P2c
P2 --> P3 --> P5
classDef entry fill:#1e3a5f,stroke:#7c9cff,color:#bfdbfe,stroke-width:2px
classDef always fill:#14532d,stroke:#86efac,color:#bbf7d0,stroke-width:2px
classDef auto fill:#0c3a5f,stroke:#7dd3fc,color:#bae6fd,stroke-width:2px
classDef triage fill:#3b1f7a,stroke:#c4b5fd,color:#ede9fe,stroke-width:2px
classDef wiki fill:#451a03,stroke:#fde68a,color:#fde68a,stroke-width:2px
classDef loose fill:#27272a,stroke:#a1a1aa,color:#e4e4e7,stroke-width:2px
classDef health fill:#0f4c4c,stroke:#5eead4,color:#99f6e4,stroke-width:2px
classDef artifact fill:#1e293b,stroke:#64748b,color:#94a3b8,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:4 3
Three automatic insight phases feed one triage gate. Phase 1a reads the per-session facets file — friction, outcome, helpfulness. Phase 1b parses report.html from the built-in /insights command, extracting pre-written CLAUDE.md sections, friction patterns, hook configs, and skill templates. Phase 1c computes persona drift across the last 10 features and emits triage candidates for any rate that shifted ≥ 5pp. All [TRIAGE] lines converge at Phase 2 — one approval gate writes CLAUDE.md edits, feedback memories, settings.json hooks, and skill files in the same session.
After the gate, the pipeline surfaces its own next version. Copyable prompts appear for next-session use. Horizon cards from /insights — autonomous pipelines, parallel worktree racing, multi-repo sync — surface as /spec candidates: the pipeline proposing what to build next.
Each command writes a persistent artifact under docs/specs/<feature>/.
| Command | What it does | Agents |
|---|---|---|
/kickoff | One-time project init — scans repo, drafts constitution, picks agent roster | — |
/spec | Confidence-tracked Q&A — writes spec.md | Interactive |
/spec-review | Parallel PRD review — gaps, risks, ambiguity; + Codex adversarial pass (optional) | 6 reviewers |
/blueprint | Architecture + implementation design (incl. wave-sequencer for data-contract precedence). Renamed from /plan 2026-05-12 — /plan belongs to Claude Code's built-in plan-mode now, not to MonsterFlow. | 7 designers |
/check | Last gate before code — validates the design; + Codex adversarial pass (optional) | 6 validators |
/build | Parallel execution with verification discipline; + Codex implementation review (optional) | Superpowers |
/autorun | Queues a spec and drives all 8 stages unattended. One slug per invocation; multi-spec queues use autorun-batch.sh --mode=overnight. Permissive overnight: contract / docs / test findings get logged as follow-ups; architectural and security findings get up to three logged attempts to converge before halting. Works cross-project — engine scripts stay in MonsterFlow, target repo's git/docs/queue live in $PWD. See the Autorun section above. | Shell |
/flow | Displays the workflow reference card | — |
/wrap | Session wrap-up — three automatic insight phases feed one triage gate (CLAUDE.md · Memory · hooks · skills), then git loose ends. Variants: quick (fast, skips insights) · full (forces soft-skip phases) | — |
The pipeline ships in this repo (v0.14.1). Everything else is third-party — installed at latest from its source. No version pinning required for normal use.
Required
| Tool | Why | How to get it |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code CLI | The harness this pipeline runs in | claude.com/claude-code |
| Python ≥ 3.9 | Used by session-cost.py, persona-metrics scripts, benchmarks | brew install python |
Plugins
| Tier | Plugin | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Always-on | superpowers | Execution discipline — TDD, debugging, verification, code review |
| Always-on | context7 | Library / framework / API documentation fetching |
| On-demand | firecrawl · code-review · ralph-loop · playwright | Research · GitHub PR review · micro-iteration · browser automation |
| Periodic | claude-md-management · skill-creator · claude-code-setup | Meta-tooling — audit CLAUDE.md, build new skills, recommend automations |
$ claude plugins install superpowers context7Optional integrations
| Integration | Why | Install |
|---|---|---|
| graphify recommended for best performance |
Knowledge-graph backend driving the 10–20× token reduction shown in the Knowledge loop | pip install graphifyylast reviewed: 0.4.21 |
| Codex | Adversarial reviewer at /spec-review, /check, /build — silent skip if not installed |
npm i -g @openai/codex+ openai/codex-plugin-cc marketplace |
| Obsidian | Destination for distilled wiki pages produced at /wrap |
obsidian.md + set OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH |
| gh CLI | Used by code-review plugin and a few git-aware scripts |
brew install gh && gh auth login |
Clone, run the installer, then open any project and type /kickoff.
$ git clone https://github.com/Jstottlemyer/MonsterFlow.git ~/Projects/MonsterFlow $ cd ~/Projects/MonsterFlow && ./install.sh
The installer symlinks commands, personas, templates, and settings into ~/.claude/, then offers to install plugins.
One manual step if you use the Obsidian wiki skills. The installer detects and configures everything else automatically (graphify CLI, OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH export, Obsidian.app via brew). But the vault itself has to be created inside Obsidian: launch Obsidian.app, choose Create new vault, point it at ~/Documents/Obsidian/wiki (the installer's default, overridable in ~/.obsidian-wiki/config). Then re-run bash install.sh — it will append the sentinel-bracketed export to ~/.zshrc on the second pass.
39 personas (30 always-available pipeline + 9 domain) plus 2 focused Claude Code subagents (autorun-shell-reviewer, persona-metrics-validator). A session calls only the slice for the current phase — never all 41 at once. The cards below show which slice runs at which gate.
/spec-review 6Requirements · Gaps · Ambiguity · Feasibility · Scope · Stakeholders
/blueprint 7API · Data Model · UX · Scalability · Security · Integration · Wave Sequencer
/check 6Completeness · Sequencing · Risk · Scope Discipline · Security Architect · Testability
Correctness · Dependency · Design Quality · Documentation · Performance · Resilience · Security · Test Quality · Wiring
Judge (quality scoring) · Synthesis (multi-agent consolidation) — used by /spec-review, /blueprint, /check
mobile/ 6 iOS · games/ 3 game-dev. Loaded only when /kickoff matches the project — never globally active. Projects can add their own (e.g. AuthTools adds 5).
/flow reference cardWhat you see in-session when you type /flow.
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ SESSION WORKFLOW ║ ╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ ║ ║ PROJECT SETUP (once per project) ║ ║ /kickoff → constitution + agent roster ║ ║ ║ ║ FEATURE (full pipeline) ║ ║ /spec → /spec-review → /blueprint → /check → /build ║ ║ define 7 PRD 7 design 6 check execute ║ ║ (Q&A) agents agents agents (parallel) ║ ║ + firecrawl (research) · context7 (API docs) ║ ║ + codex adversarial review at spec-review, check, build ║ ║ (optional — silent skip if not set up) ║ ║ ║ ║ WORK-SIZE SCALING ║ ║ Bug fix: describe it → fix it → verify ║ ║ Small change: /spec (quick) → /build ║ ║ Feature: full pipeline above ║ ║ V2/Rework: revise existing spec → full pipeline ║ ║ ║ ║ PARALLEL WORK ║ ║ "work on X, Y, and Z in parallel" ║ ║ → Each dispatched to a subagent ║ ║ ║ ║ IN-SESSION DISCIPLINE [Superpowers] ║ ║ → systematic-debugging · verification-before-done ║ ║ → requesting-code-review · ralph-loop (micro-iteration) ║ ║ ║ ║ CODE REVIEW ║ ║ Quick: superpowers requesting-code-review ║ ║ PR: /code-review plugin ║ ║ Full: 9 parallel code-review personas ║ ║ ║ ║ ARTIFACTS ║ ║ docs/specs/constitution.md (project principles) ║ ║ docs/specs/<feature>/spec.md (living spec) ║ ║ docs/specs/<feature>/review.md (PRD review findings) ║ ║ docs/specs/<feature>/design.md (implementation design) ║ ║ docs/specs/<feature>/check.md (gap checkpoint) ║ ║ ║ ║ KNOWLEDGE LAYER [graphify + obsidian] ║ ║ Fires automagically at /wrap — no typing, no friction: ║ ║ _raw/ → wiki pages (wiki-ingest) ║ ║ session → projects/<name>/ (wiki-update) ║ ║ graph export + lint (wiki-export · wiki-lint) ║ ║ graphify digest → _raw/ (silent arch snapshot) ║ ║ Manual (rare): ║ ║ /graphify [path] build code knowledge graph ║ ║ /graphify query "Q" graph traversal answer ║ ║ "what do I know about X" wiki-query ║ ║ "capture this: X" wiki-capture → _raw/ ║ ║ Compile, don't retrieve. Capture cheap, distill at /wrap. ║ ║ ║ ║ SESSION END ║ ║ /wrap → insights (facets · report.html · persona drift) ║ ║ triage gate (CLAUDE.md · memory · hooks · skills) ║ ║ knowledge flush · git loose ends ║ ║ ║ ╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ AGENTS: review(7) design(7) check(6) code-review(9) ║ ║ + judge · synthesis · domain agents ║ ║ ║ ║ PLUGINS ║ ║ Always-on: superpowers · context7 ║ ║ On-demand: firecrawl · code-review · ralph-loop ║ ║ playwright ║ ║ Periodic: claude-md-management · skill-creator ║ ║ claude-code-setup ║ ║ Optional: codex — adversarial review at spec-review, ║ ║ /check, /build (silent skip if not set up) ║ ║ ║ ║ Superpowers: in-session execution discipline ║ ║ Plugins: specialized capabilities ║ ║ You say WHAT. Claude handles HOW. ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝